News


Companies worried about climate change impacts--especially water and political instability,but few have taken action.

Four Twenty Seven and the University of Notre Dame’s Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN), with support from Business for Social Responsibility published the 2015 Corporate Adaptation Report to generate insights into whether and how enterprises are preparing for the physical impacts of climate change.

1. What Are the Climate Risk Drivers of Greatest Concern?

Water scarcity and political instability driven by climate change are cited as the top two anticipated risks across sectors.

  • 16%: Water scarcity is the climate hazard of greatest concern for corporations
  • 14%: Social and political instability driven by climate change closely follows water.

2. How Will Climate Change Affect Businesses?

  • 70%+: Are “somewhat concerned” that climate change will have a material impact on their value chain, in particular their supply chain, distribution and customers and markets.  
  • 66%: Expressed concern over increased operational and capital costs, reporting they had already experienced cost increases or considered them a likely in the future.
  • 30%: Faced or are experiencing impacts from climate change that negatively impact their bottom line.
  • 20%: Are “very concerned” about the material impact on their value chain.

3. How Do Companies Assess Climate Risk?

  • 43%: Monitored climate risk in some capacity as part of their enterprise risk management.
  • 30%: Haven’t developed a plan to adapt their business to climate change impacts. 
  • 29%: Are looking at a specific driver of concern.

4: How Do Companies Obtain Information on Climate Risk? (In order of importance)

  • Publicly available data, reports and websites.
  • industry associations and/or non-profit led initiatives.
  • Internal sustainability teams.

5. Who Within an Organization Should Be in Charge of Climate Adaptation?

  • 28%: the sustainability team.
  • 24%: risk management team.
  • Respondents were least confident in the level of understanding of climate change held by their investor relations, their supply chain team, and Board of Directors.

6. Have Companies Already Implemented Adaptation Measures? (In order of importance)

  • Energy and water efficiency; 
  • Business continuity plan.
  • Staff training on risk management.
  • Retrofitting or relocation of company assets are are under consideration.
  • Few  respondents reported having already implemented retrofitting.
  • None reported relocation of assets as a current measure.

7. What Are the Main Barriers to Corporate Adaptation?

  • Not an immediate priority
  • Lack of leadership on climate change. 

8. Is Climate Change a Material Risk Now?

  • 33%: Expected impacts in the 5-20 years.
  • 30%: Climate change has already had a material impact.
  • 20%: Did not expect impacts for at least another 20 years.
  • Few expected short-term material impacts from climate change (1-5 years).

9. What Are the Next Steps in Assessing Climate Risks?

  • The most common is engaging with key industry groups to build consensus on sector-wide initiatives.
  • The need for additional research and data was cited as a priority.

10. What Opportunities Might Climate Change Bring for Your Company?

  • 25%: Anticipated opportunities for new product creation and for efficiency improvements.
  • Opportunities typically associated with sustainability programs, such as brand development and cost reduction, ranked far lower.

Download the full report.


 
 
Thursday, May 21, 2015 - 11:57

- See more at: http://tgeink.com/node/1631#sthash.l6aKssY0.dpuf

 
Daniel Cusick, E&E reporter
Published: Thursday, May 14, 2015
 
Nearly one-third of businesses surveyed by researchers affiliated with the University of Notre Dame reported they have experienced material impacts from climate events, while more than 70 percent said they are at least "somewhat concerned" that climate change will have a material impact on their operations in the future.
 
Those findings come from the inaugural "State of Corporate Adaptation Survey," a joint project of Notre Dame's Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN) and Four Twenty Seven, a private consulting firm focused on climate risk and adaptation. Results were released yesterday at the National Adaptation Forum in St. Louis.
 
The survey responses, collected in March and April, reveal that water scarcity and political and social instability caused by climate stresses are top concerns for businesses, and that many executives are preparing for increased operational and capital costs associated with climate change adaptation.
 
A deeper reading into concerns about political and social instability shows that respondents "are aware of the many potential implications of climate change on human systems, which can include civil unrest, public health crises, political upheaval, and displaced populations where weak systems and resource constraints prevail," the report states.
 
Joyce Coffee, ND-GAIN's managing director, said in a statement that the report "shows climate change is impacting the corporate bottom line, and there is opportunity to increase their preparedness," especially as leaders prepare for the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties on climate change in December in Paris.
 
Experts say the survey's purpose is to advance understanding of corporate best practices, barriers and enablers, as well as strategies to prepare corporations for climate change. The World Economic Forum's latest Global Risk report ranks failure to adapt to climate change as one of the greatest and most likely risks facing governments and the private sector in an era of warming.
 
Assessing the 'early movers'
 
The survey netted more than 230 responses from 37 private companies, most of which were headquartered in the United States, but also from Mexico, Europe and Asia. Eight economic sectors were represented among the respondents, ranging from consumer goods and professional services to utilities, financial institutions, health care and technology firms.
 
Researchers cautioned, however, that the survey should not be viewed as an economy-wide assessment of corporate perspectives on climate change. Rather, it is a "snapshot of how companies most invested in the space -- early adopters and early movers -- think about and act on climate change risk."
 
The Global Adaptation Index, launched by the Washington, D.C.-based Global Adaptation Institute, was absorbed by Notre Dame's Environmental Change Initiative in 2013.
 
The open-access index uses data analysis and technology to promote climate adaptation, including identifying places most vulnerable to extreme weather and changing climate, as well as finding real-world solutions that can prevent such changes from becoming disasters. The group also annually ranks 175 countries against 45 indicators of risk and adaptation readiness based on data going back to 1995.
 
The index has consistently shown that countries in more developed regions of the world -- including Scandinavia, Europe, North America and Australia -- will fare best under climate change, while poor and developing countries in Africa and South Asia face the greatest degrees of risk and vulnerability.
 
The United States ranked eighth in the latest ND-GAIN index with a score of 78.9 out of 100, behind the United Kingdom and ahead of Germany. The world's highest-ranking country was Norway (82.7), while Chad bottomed the list of ranked countries with a score of 31.6.
Jessica Hellmann

This is part of an op-ed written by ND-GAIN Research Director, Jessica Hellmann.

Please visit the CNN website for the entire article.

 

(CNN) - The Vatican hasn't been shy about tackling controversial issues head on since Pope Francis assumed the papacy. Indeed, from gay marriage to inequality, the Vatican has reinvigorated debate, sometimes in surprising ways, on a range of social issues. So it should probably come as no surprise that it is set to weigh in on one of the biggest issues facing society today: global warming.

While officials from across the globe continue negotiations on policies aimed at managing and reducing changes to the world's climate, the Vatican has turned a spotlight on the impact climate change will have on the world's poorest through a workshop this Tuesday that will set the stage for an anticipated encyclical later this year.

This workshop on "moral dimensions of climate change" is a welcome move, because climate change is as much about justice, dignity and equity as it is about computer models, atmospheric chemistry and carbon taxes. After all, its devastating effects -- bigger, more destructive hurricanes; hotter, longer droughts; record-breaking wildfires and devastating floods -- are poised to disproportionately harm the poor…

> > Click here to read Jessica Hellmann's entire op-ed on CNN

 

The Washington Post

 

What is the best place to weather climate change? Research by the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index, or ND-GAIN, suggests it is Scandinavia. In a pinch, though, any developed country will do. As these maps by ND-GAIN illustrate, developed countries are far less vulnerable than developing countries to the risks of climate change.

ND-GAIN ranks 175 countries both by vulnerability and readiness to adapt to climate change. The group measures vulnerability by considering the potential impact of climate change on six areas: food, water, health, ecosystem service, human habitat and infrastructure. The readiness rank weights portions of the economy, governance and society that affect the speed and efficiency of adaptation projects.

The areas in red, including most of Africa and South Asia, are very vulnerable to climate change and ill-prepared to deal with its impact. The few countries in blue, including Vietnam, Ghana, Rwanda, Namibia and Botswana, are countries that are vulnerable but are relatively well equipped. Countries in yellow are less vulnerable but also less prepared. The countries in green, which include most of the world’s developed countries, are both less vulnerable and better equipped to deal with the challenge of climate change.

Here is the map broken down by readiness, with green indicating “more ready” and red indicating “less ready”:

And here is the map for vulnerability:

According to the index, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden and Finland are best equipped to deal with the pressures of climate change, while the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Eritrea, Burundi and Chad are the worst equipped.

Gizmodo

 

Which Countries Are Most Likely to Be Wiped Out By Future Disasters?

The results of a new report show which countries are the most vulnerable to risk—and the most ready to respond when disaster strikes.

Bigger storms and more flooding are some of the most most obvious ingredients in the risk stew brewed up by climate change. But what happens after the storms subside? What about all the secondary and tertiary effects of climate change? What about the challenge of finding the money or doing the infrastructural planning necessary to adapt to a changed environment, or the political stability and leadership to see a country through a time of dire food or water scarcity?

That's the kind of cause-and-effect planning that the Global Adaptation Index or GAIN has been doing since 1995. Every year GAIN, which was based in DC until it moved to become part of Notre Dame two years ago, publishes a report that ranks every country in the world on a scale from 1 to 100. The metrics that determine a country's score are twofold: First, how vulnerable is the country to climate change, defined as "sensitivity to climate, population, infrastructure and resource stress, as well as the country's adaptive capacity to those stresses"? And second, how prepared is the country to deal with those risks, in terms of "social, governance and economic factors"?

The idea is to give leaders the ability to gauge and assess how a particular country will respond to the rising tides, and all the chaos they bring with them. In November, the group met for its annual meeting to release its latest report—and the results are fascinating, if troubling.

1) We're all better prepared today than 20 years ago

GAIN has been doing its rankings since 1995, and a comparison between the earliest and most recent risk maps show us that the world, in large part, is better prepared than it was in the 1990s.

Which Countries Are Most Likely to Be Wiped Out By Future Disasters?

2) Norway is the most prepared of all

Yep, the country with the 7th longest coastline in the world is also the most prepared for climate change. In fact, the report points out, it's been #1 for preparedness for two decades, thanks to high scores for food stability, healthcare, access to clean water, and energy infrastructure.

3) The most at-risk countries are war-torn (and mostly land-locked)

The countries most at risk and least prepared are in Africa, and all of them have been destabilized by war—from the Democratic Republic of the Congo to Chad, which occupies the last spot on the list. Most have a dearth of agricultural and medical resources combined with infrastructural and political insecurity.

Which Countries Are Most Likely to Be Wiped Out By Future Disasters?

4) Russia and China are getting better, Jordan is getting worse

In its release notes, GAIN points out the countries that have risen the highest and dropped the lowest. While Russia and China are improving, Jordan fell by 31 points—seemingly because of its low scores when it comes to fresh water access and dam capacity, a big issue for plenty of Middle Eastern countries.

5) If you're looking for a safe haven, go to Scandinavia

Norway won the day, but all of Scandinavia made it into the top ten, alongside other Northern European countries, the US, Germany, and Australia and New Zealand. "Many do face moderate exposure to climate change, but they have good capacities to deal with the potential climate risks, including high access to amenities such as electricity, sanitation and clean drinking water," a release explains.

Which Countries Are Most Likely to Be Wiped Out By Future Disasters?

 The Best and Worst Places in the World to Live As Climate Changes

An index developed at the University of Notre Dame is giving us a glimpse of what countries are the best and worst to live in based on their ability to cope with the impacts of climate change.

The rankings come from the so-called ND-GAIN index, which is based on the vulnerability and readiness of each country to adapt to climate change's impacts.

Vulnerability to climate change is based on six factors: food, water, health, ecosystem service, human habitat and infrastructure. The readiness index is made up of three components: economic readiness, governance readiness and social readiness.

A formula is then used to come up with the overall rating for each country around the world on a scale of 0 to 100. 

All but one of the top five best countries are located in Europe. The United States ranked eighth.

Of the top 10 worst countries, eight are located in Africa.

 

Originally published at edu.sina.com.cn

Climate change experts have released maps of the world revealing how prepared different countries are to cope with the effects of climate change。

  最近,气候变化专家发布了一张气候地图,该图显示了全球不同国家对气候变化的应对情况。

全球气候变化应对地图全球气候变化应对地图

  In the maps, 192 countries are ranked by their ‘vulnerability’ and ‘readiness’, to produce an overall judgement on their fate。

  从“脆弱”性和“准备”性这两个角度,这张地图评价了全球192个国家对气候变化的应对情况。

  The results reveal that Scandinavian countries and the UK are among the most likely to survive - butareas of sub-Saharan Africa will be hardest hit。    

  结果显示斯堪的纳维亚和英国受气候变化影响最小,而撒哈拉以南非洲将面临最大威胁。

  The maps were created by London-based company The Eco Experts, using data from the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, known as the ND-GainIndex。

  这张地图由伦敦The Eco Experts公司制作,数据来自印第安纳州的诺特丹大学,被称作ND-Gain Index。

  They took into account location,terrain, pollution rates and national resources when calculating which countries would be most affected。

  他们将位置、地形、污染程度和国家资源都纳入评判标准,以此来计算哪些国家最易被气候变化所影响。

  Countries like Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark score well on the scale。

  挪威、瑞典、芬兰和丹麦等国家的得分很高。

  But places like Central America,Africa and India all appear at risk from natural disaster - and are poorly equipped to cope, said The Eco Experts。

  而中美洲、非洲和印度则极易遭受自然灾害,而且它们的应对措施也十分不完备。

COUNTRIES THAT WILL BE MOST AND LEAST AFFECTED BY    CLIMATE CHANGE

受气候变化影响最大和最小国家排行

Least affected

影响最小

Score

得分

Most affected

影响最大

Score

得分

1 - Norway        

  挪威

     82.7 1 – Chad   

  乍得

       31.6
2 - New Zealand

  新西兰

     82.2 2 –Eritrea     

  厄立特里亚国

       33.8
3 - Sweden

  瑞典

     81.6 2 - Burundi

  布隆迪

       33.8
4 – Finland

  芬兰

     81.5 4 - Democratic Republic of Congo

  刚果民主共和国

       34.0
5 – Denmark

  丹麦

     81.4 4  - Central Africa Republic

  中非共和国

       34.0
6 – Australia

  澳大利亚

     80.1 6 – Sudan

  苏丹

       35.5   
7 - United Kingdom

  英国

     80.0 7 – Niger

  尼日尔

       35.6
8 - United States

  美国

    78.9 7 – Haiti

  海地

       35.6
9 – Germany

  德国

    78.8 7 –Afghanistan

  阿富汗

       35.6
9 – Iceland

  冰岛

    78.8 10 - Guinea-Bissau

  几内亚比绍

       37.3

  Jon Whiting, of The Eco Expertswarned: ‘Hurricanes, earthquakes, blizzards, droughts and flooding are all real dangers for some of these areas, and this is compounded by a lack of national strategy to counteract the effects.’

  The Eco Experts专家Jon Whiting警告说:“飓风、地震、暴风雪、干旱和洪水会严重威胁这些地区,而国家应对措施的缺失更会加剧这一风险。

  Burundi, Chad, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo produced some of the lowest scores, meaning these countries will be the biggest victims of weather disasters。

  布隆迪、乍得、苏丹和刚果民主共和国得分最低,它们即将成为气候变化的最大受害者。

  The map is based on data compiled by the ND-Gain index, which has been monitoring 45 internal and external indicators of climate change exposure of 192 countries since 1992.

  这张图的数据来自于 ND-Gain index。自1992年以来,ND-Gain index就通过观察45个内部和外部指标,来评判全球192个国家的气候变化情况。

  The index is built on two variables; ‘vulnerability’ and ‘readiness’ for which a country gets a separate mark for each. These scores tally up to produce an overall total indicating howa particular nation would fare。

  这项指标有两个指数:“脆弱”指数和“准备”指数。每个国家在这两项上都有一个得分,指数之和则显示这个国家未来的命运。

  On the scale, the country best equipped to cope with the effects of climate change was Norway. In fact, Norway has topped the ranking every year since the Index began in 1995.

  在这张表中,挪威的应对措施最为完备。事实上,自1995年以来,挪威就一直雄踞榜首。

欧洲欧洲

  Most countries across Europe will be not be severely affected by climate change, according to the map. It takes into accounts many factors such as access to clean drinking water and the risk of heat waves。

  地图显示,大多数欧洲国家都不会过多地被气候变化所影响。地图考虑到众多因素,如干净的水源和遭受热浪的风险。

非洲非洲
南美洲南美洲

  But places in sub-Saharan Africa (shown upper) will be most affected by a warming climate, while some countries in America like Bolivia (below) will also also be severely affected by global warming。

  然而气候变暖对撒哈拉以南非洲国家影响最大,此外,每周的一些国家,例如玻利维亚,也会大受影响。

北美洲北美洲

  North America will also apparently be able to cope with the effects of climate change, thanks to high readiness scores for the USA and Canada。

  显然,得益于美国和加拿大,北美洲的得分也很高,。

亚洲亚洲

  Asia has a wide range of scores for different countries, owing to the vastly different climates and levels of infrastructure in various countries. Surprisingly, Australia comes out fairly well in the map, despite being a notoriously hot country。

  由于气候和基础设施的差异,亚洲各个国家的指数相差较大。尽管天气炎热,澳大利亚在应对气候变化上却表现优异。

岛屿岛屿

  Various islands such as Haiti will be severely affected by climate change, perhaps due to the effects of rising sea levels. Others like Barbados, though, will apparently avoid some of the worst effect。

  由于海平面的上升,气候变化也许会对众多岛屿国家产生影响。但对于某些国家,例如巴巴多斯,影响则不会很大。

  (来源:《每日邮报》;编译:Heidi)

Sea levels are rising faster than scientists thought: Climate change has triggered acceleration, claims study

 

Sea levels have risen faster than expected in the last 20 years as a result of global warming and other factors, according to new research.

The study claims that estimates for sea level rises between 1901 and 1990 were too high due to incomplete records.

But from 1990 to 2010, sea levels were correctly predicted to be rising faster than ever before.  

This caused a discrepancy in which the slower sea level rise seen in the last century caused the increase in recent years to appear even more rapid.